In This Issue

Jump to Page

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121
Share

Want to share this article with your online community?

Add to del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Linkedin

THE ENERGY FUTURE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS IN BRUSSELS: BETWEEN PRESERVATION AND PERFORMANCE

Area to be improvedPerformance before improvements [W/m2.K]ImprovementPerformance after improvements [W/m2.K]
Sloped roof1.03Interior insulation0.33
Façades1.60Exterior insulation0.58
Dormer front2.45Exterior insulation0.78
Board above1.97Insulation under0.40
cellar Wood, single glazing5.24Version A: replaced with laminated glass (Ug=3.4 W/m2.K) / panel3.16
Version B: replaced with double glazing (Ug=1.9 W/m2.K) / panel1.99
Back door4.23Version A: replaced with laminated glass (Ug=3.4 W/m2.K) / panel2.81
Version B: replaced with double glazing (Ug=1.9 W/m2.K) / panel2.38
Veranda roof2.26Heated roof system0.58
Attic roof1.92Insulation of the wooden floor in the attic0.81
Veranda façades2.84Exterior insulation0.70
AirtightnessBad v50 = 12m3/h.m2Improve airtightnessGood5 v50 = 3m3/h.m2
HeatingEfficiency: 65.40%No improvement realisedEfficiency: 83.02%
LightingSeveral incandescent light bulbsReplace incandescent light bulbs with LEDsOnly low-energy light bulbs
VentilationNo ventilation systemNatural air supply and extraction via the wet areas+/- System C

Table 2

Measures Kruisbooglaan 34 (© Cenergie).



51